Skip to content
coeducate
Sign in
How it works Features Use cases Pricing Student privacy Blog FAQ Contact Sign in

AI reading tutor and AI literacy tutoring that names the comprehension gap

A wrong answer about a passage can be vocabulary, retrieval or inference. The cross looks the same in all three. The tutor coaches the student with a question and tells you which one failed.

See pricing

Paste a reading answer and read the card it returns. Student work is never used to train models.

Mastery Check

of 3 runs left

Subject

Grade band

Nothing here is stored

Use the sample or your own practice text. Never paste a real student's name.

Tutor mode

Session evidence card

This is what a teacher opens after every session. That was your third run. Nothing you typed was stored.

01 The short answer

What an AI reading tutor for a school has to do

An AI reading tutor for grades 3 to 12 coaches each student through questions on a passage the teacher chose, without handing over the answer, and reports back. Coeducate reads the student's typed answer, asks where in the text the evidence is, and writes a card for the teacher naming the weak skill (for example, inferring what the author left out), quoting the student's sentence and suggesting a five-minute reteach. Read-aloud tutors for K to 2 decoding are a different product.

Classroom is $89 a month for one teacher and 60 students. School covers 10 educators and 600 students for $2,088 a year, about $3.48 per student, reading and math included.

At a glance

Grades
3 to 12, strongest in 4 to 9
Material
Your own passages and questions
Student help
Questions and hints, never the answer
Teacher output
Weak skill, evidence, reteach
Not covered
K to 2 decoding, oral fluency
Published price
From $89 per month

02 Which kind you are buying

Four kinds of AI tutor for reading, and who each one serves

"AI reading tutor" covers tools built for different ages and different skills. Most of what districts buy today listens to young children read aloud; Education Week counted statewide Amira contracts in ten states in November 2025. That is the right purchase for decoding. It is the wrong one for a seventh grader who reads every word correctly and still misses the point.

Kind Examples Skill it builds What the teacher gets Best for
Read-aloud tutor Amira, Ello (home use) Decoding and oral fluency, from speech Words missed, fluency rate, screener scores K to 3 early readers
Adaptive literacy program Lexia Core 5, Istation Foundational skills along a fixed sequence Placement and progress on the program's own content Schools that want a full supplemental curriculum
General chatbot ChatGPT, Gemini An explanation of the text, usually the answer Nothing unless the student shares the chat Teacher planning and text sets
Comprehension tutor on your passages Coeducate Retrieval, vocabulary in context, inference, author stance The weak skill, the student's sentence, a reteach plan Grades 3 to 12 readers who decode but miss meaning

If your gap is K to 2 decoding, buy a read-aloud tutor; we do not listen to students read. What those cost is in our Amira Learning cost and Istation cost per student articles, and the Amira Learning alternative page shows where the two kinds of tutor split. If your school runs book quizzes for independent reading, see what Accelerated Reader costs per student. Comparing every kind of online reading intervention program by what the teacher gets back is a separate page.

03 Three different failures, one cross

Reading data is usually one number too coarse

A reading level tells you where to shelve a book. It does not tell you why a student who decodes fluently cannot answer a question about what the author is suggesting, or why a student with strong inference stalls on a paragraph full of unfamiliar vocabulary.

Those are different problems with different fixes and different timelines. Merging them into "comprehension: developing" is how a year of intervention gets spent on the wrong thing.

Decoding

The words did not come off the page reliably enough for meaning to survive.

Vocabulary

The words were read but two of them were not known, and both were load bearing.

Literal retrieval

The detail is in the text and was not found, usually because the search strategy is linear.

Inference

The detail was found but the step from stated to implied was not taken.

Author stance

The passage was understood as information and not as an argument with a position.

Session evidence card, grade 6-8 reading

Fixed example

Diagnosis

Summarizes the text instead of inferring from it

The student restates three facts in order and then attaches an evaluation the passage never makes. The omitted inspection fee, which is the author's actual signal, is not used at all.

Next tutoring move / hint only

The report left one cost out. Which one, and why would an author mention that a cost was left out?

Skill mastery read

Retrieving explicit detail

Secure
88%

Correctly lists the vote, the request and the cost ratio.

Inferring author stance

Not yet
18%

Attaches it was a good decision, which the passage does not say.

Using omitted information as evidence

Not yet
24%

Does not mention the excluded annual inspection fee at all.

Citing textual evidence

Developing
47%

Paraphrases the passage but never anchors a claim to a line.

Teacher note

Retrieves detail reliably but treats inference questions as summary questions, so any what is the author suggesting item will fail until stance is taught explicitly.

Reteach in 5 minutes

What was left out on purpose

  1. Read the paragraph and list every cost named.
  2. Ask which cost is missing and who benefits from that.
  3. Rewrite the answer starting with The author is hinting that.

Note the shape of the record: strong retrieval, absent inference. A single comprehension score would have averaged those two into a middling number and pointed intervention at the wrong skill.

04 Fiction and nonfiction

The same engine, two different skill vocabularies

Literary text

  • Character motive read from action rather than stated feeling
  • Narrative perspective and its reliability
  • Function of an image or a repeated detail
  • Tone and its effect on the reader
  • Theme distinguished from plot summary

Informational text

  • Claim separated from evidence
  • Author stance and what has been left out
  • Text structure used as a comprehension aid
  • Cross-referencing two sources that disagree
  • Numbers in prose read accurately

Both run over the passages you already teach. There is no reading library to adopt, which is what makes this usable alongside a curriculum you did not choose. See how adaptation works over your own material, or AI tutoring for students for the same tutor across math and reading by grade band.

05 For intervention teams

Documentation that writes itself

A tiered support decision needs evidence over time, per skill, with something concrete underneath the claim. Producing that usually means an extra assessment window and a spreadsheet somebody maintains by hand.

Here it accumulates from the reading the student was doing anyway. Session eight is read against session one, per skill, with the student's own sentences as the evidence line. More on student progress tracking.

Running pull-out groups for students who decode but miss meaning? The reading comprehension intervention program page shows how a Tier 2 block runs on it.

Pricing this next to a program you already license? We collected real district quotes for the Lexia Core 5 cost per student, for the read-aloud tutor Amira Learning cost and for Newsela pricing for schools.

Inferring author stance, one student, eight sessions

Session 1 Not yet
Session 3 Not yet
Session 5 Developing
Session 8 Secure

Each point on that series links back to the session it came from and the sentence the student wrote, so the growth claim can be checked rather than trusted.

Reading teacher at a small table working through printed passages with a group on laptops

06 In the room

While the tutor coaches, you sit with the readers who need you

A 45-minute comprehension block with 18 students usually splits three ways within ten minutes: the ones who found the evidence, the ones who found it and could not say what it implies, and the ones stuck on two words. The tutor keeps coaching the first two groups. The cards tell you who is in the third, so that is the table you sit at.

  1. 1

    Assign

    Paste the passage you are already teaching and two or three questions. No library to adopt.

  2. 2

    Students answer

    They type a short answer. The tutor asks where the evidence is, never supplies it.

  3. 3

    Read the cards

    Each answer comes back with the weak skill named and the student's own sentence.

  4. 4

    Reteach

    Group by skill and use the five-minute reteach on the card, today or tomorrow.

07 By grade band

Choosing an AI reading tutor for elementary, middle and high school

Grades 3 to 5

This is where the shift from learning to read to reading to learn exposes students who decode well and understand little. Keep passages short and answers to one or two sentences. If a student cannot read the passage aloud accurately, send them to a decoding program first; comprehension coaching will not fix that.

Grades 6 to 8

Informational text, argument and author stance carry most of the state test here, and inference is the skill that most often fails quietly. A tutor that separates retrieval from inference is the one worth paying for. The Tier 2 version of this block is on the reading comprehension intervention programs page.

High school

Older readers rarely need more passages. They need someone to notice that they summarize instead of analyze. Use the tutor on the texts already in the English or history unit, and use the cards as the dated evidence an intervention or 504 meeting asks for.

08 Price

What an AI reading tutor costs per student

Most reading programs are quoted, not published. Ours is published, so the per-student figure is simple arithmetic. The other rows come from vendor list prices and district quotes we read and linked in our pricing articles.

Reading specialist at a desk reviewing annotated reading responses beside a laptop
Product What it covers Per student, per year
Coeducate Classroom 1 teacher, 60 students, reading and math $8.80
Coeducate School 10 educators, 600 students, reading and math $3.48
Amira Tutor (list) Read-aloud tutor module $15.00
Amira Reading Suite (list) Screener, instruction and tutor $35.00
Lexia Core 5 (district quotes) Foundational literacy program $30 to $35

Monthly billing is also available: $89 a month for Classroom and $349 a month for School. Sources and district figures are in the Lexia Core 5 cost per student and Newsela pricing for schools articles, and the full plan list is on the pricing page.

09 Questions

AI reading tutor questions schools ask

Is there an AI reading tutor?

Yes, and they come in two families. Read-aloud tutors such as Amira listen to a young child read a passage and correct the words. Comprehension tutors such as Coeducate work with a student in grade 3 or up on what the text means, coach with questions, and tell the teacher whether a wrong answer came from vocabulary, retrieval or inference.

What is the best AI reading tutor?

It depends on the grade and the skill. For K to 2 decoding and fluency, a read-aloud tutor that hears the child is the right tool, and Amira is the most widely adopted. For grades 3 to 12 students who read the words but miss the meaning, the best AI reading tutor is one that diagnoses comprehension on your own passages and shows the teacher why.

Can AI help with reading comprehension?

Yes, when it asks rather than answers. A tutor that summarizes the passage for the student does the reading for them. One that asks where in the text the answer is, or what the author left out, makes the student do the thinking. Coeducate works that way and records each comprehension skill separately, so the teacher sees which one is failing.

Do AI reading tutors actually work?

The evidence is still thin. Education Week reported in November 2025 that research on AI reading tutors for young students is not conclusive, even though Amira alone holds statewide contracts in ten states. Buy on what you can check: does the tool tell a teacher something they can act on this week, and can you see every session it ran?

How much does an AI reading tutor cost?

Amira lists its Tutor module at $15 per student a year and the full Reading Suite at $35, with districts paying $15 to $30 net. Coeducate publishes its price: $89 a month for one teacher and 60 students, or $2,088 a year for a school of 600 students, about $3.48 per student, covering reading and math.

Is there an AI reading tutor for kids?

For children in kindergarten to grade 2 the useful tools listen to them read aloud, because the skill being built is decoding. That is not what we do. Coeducate starts at grade 3, where students type short answers about a passage, and it suits upper elementary and middle school readers who decode well but lose the meaning.

Can ChatGPT be a reading tutor?

It can explain a passage, but by default it explains it for the student, which removes the reading. It also keeps no record a teacher can use. A school AI reading tutor should withhold the answer, ask the next question, and keep a per-skill history for each student. ChatGPT is useful for teacher planning, less so as the tutor itself.

What does an AI literacy tutor do in an intervention block?

It gives every student in the group a coach while the teacher works with three or four of them. In Coeducate each student answers questions on an assigned passage, gets a hint instead of the answer, and the teacher receives a card per student naming the weak comprehension skill, quoting their sentence and suggesting a short reteach.

10 For the person who signs off

Two things a curriculum director asks first

Evidence you can present

Per-skill mastery per student, exportable, with the student's own reasoning attached. It survives a board slide and an MTSS meeting because the wording came from the student, not from a summary.

A privacy posture built for minors

Student work is not used to train models. No advertising, no data resale, deletable on request. Designed around FERPA and COPPA obligations, and our security page states plainly which formal attestations we do and do not hold.

Rollout, procurement and the full sign-off checklist are on the pricing page, alongside the cost-per-student estimator.

11 Pricing

Priced per program, not per seat

Annual billing saves 50%. There is no free tier, and the privacy posture is identical on every plan.

Classroom

$89/mo

One teacher, up to 60 students, CSV mastery export.

School

$349/mo

Up to 10 educators and 600 students, roles, SSO, scheduled reports.

District

$1,290/mo

Up to 75 educators and 5,000 students, standards mapping, SIS export, PO billing.

Full pricing and Enterprise

More AI tools for teachers

Product pages

Paste a comprehension answer and see the split

The demo separates retrieval from inference on any reading answer you give it. Nothing you type is stored.

Student work is never used to train models. No card required to try the demo.

Try the demo

Mastery evidence after every session.