Use cases
Six situations where the evidence card is the thing that was missing. Each one names who runs it, what comes out and what it replaces.
01 Six use cases
The common thread: in each one, somebody currently reconstructs by hand what the student was thinking, from a mark on a page. That reconstruction is the work Coeducate removes.
01
Intervention teacher, 20 minutes, six students
A pull-out group is short, and most of it is spent working out why each student got it wrong. Cards from the previous session arrive already grouped by misconception, so the block starts with the group already formed and the activity already chosen.
Replaces: re-grading the same six papers to find the pattern.
02
ELA teacher or reading specialist
A wrong answer on a comprehension question can be decoding, vocabulary or inference, and the mark looks identical in all three cases. Coeducate separates them and says which one failed, with the student sentence that shows it.
Replaces: a running record plus a guess.
03
Any subject teacher, work done at home
Students already have AI at home. The choice is between help that hands over the answer and help that asks the next question. Socratic mode plus an evidence card means homework produces information about the student instead of destroying it.
Replaces: guessing which submissions were genuinely the student.
04
Head of Academics, 40 tutors, parent-facing
Parents pay for outcomes and receive a session summary written by a tired tutor at 9pm. Per-skill mastery across sessions one to eight is the artifact that justifies the hourly rate, and it is produced automatically.
Replaces: freeform session notes of wildly varying quality.
05
MTSS lead, Title I elementary
A tiered support decision needs per-skill documentation over time. Producing it usually means adding an assessment window nobody has room for. Here the documentation is a by-product of the tutoring that was already happening.
Replaces: an extra benchmark window and a spreadsheet.
06
Substitute teacher or teaching assistant
A substitute cannot diagnose 30 students in a subject they do not teach, and a TA supporting a small group needs to know what each student is actually stuck on. The card gives both a specific target and a script for the next move.
Replaces: a worksheet and a lost period.
02 Who it is not for
03 For the person who signs off
Per-skill mastery per student, exportable, with the student's own reasoning attached. It survives a board slide and an MTSS meeting because the wording came from the student, not from a summary.
Student work is not used to train models. No advertising, no data resale, deletable on request. Designed around FERPA and COPPA obligations, and our security page states plainly which formal attestations we do and do not hold.
Rollout, procurement and the full sign-off checklist are on the pricing page, alongside the cost-per-student estimator.
04 Pricing
Annual billing is about 17% lower. There is no free tier, and the privacy posture is identical on every plan.
Classroom
$89/mo
One teacher, up to 60 students, CSV mastery export.
School
$349/mo
Up to 10 educators and 600 students, roles, SSO, scheduled reports.
District
$1,290/mo
Up to 75 educators and 5,000 students, standards mapping, SIS export, PO billing.
Run the Mastery Check on the sample work, or paste your own practice text. Nothing you type is stored.
Student work is never used to train models. No card required to try the demo.
Mastery evidence after every session.
Get started
One field. We email you a 6-digit code to confirm the address, then the next steps for getting your classroom, school or tutoring program set up.
No card required. Student work is never used to train models. See our privacy policy.